| Overall Rating | Silver - expired |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 60.61 |
| Liaison | Roxane Beigel-Coryell |
| Submission Date | June 30, 2011 |
| Executive Letter | Download |
California State University, Channel Islands
OP-2: Building Design and Construction
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
1.50 / 4.00 |
John H.
Gormley Director, Planning Design and Construction Operations, Planning, and Construction |
New building space that meets "Eligible Buildings Criteria":
New building space that was designed and constructed in accordance with green building policies or guidelines but not LEED certified:
New building space that is LEED Certified :
New building space that is LEED Silver certified:
New building space that is LEED Gold certified :
New building space that is LEED Platinum certified:
The website URL where a copy of the institution's guidelines or policies for green building is available :
An electronic copy of the guidelines or policies :
The date(s) the policies or guidelines were adopted:
A brief description of how the institution ensures compliance with green building design and construction guidelines and policies:
The University has developed Design Guidelines that are provided to planning & design consultants, and contractors at the start of a capital project which describes sustainable strategies either required or suggested to be incorporated into the completed project. Additionally, sustainable design charettes are required to during the planning or design phase of the project to identify specific strategies to meet the stated guidelines included in the CSU Policy and Design Guidelines. Throughout the design and construction documentation phases, University staff and campus engineering consultants review the progress of the design to ensure that the project is compliant with the Policy and Guidelines, as well as what was approved during the sustainability charette. During the construction phase and at completion of the project, the campus’ commissioning agent is reviewing the progress of the project to ensure continued compliance with these, and to enable the project to be occupied with all of the building systems fully commissioned and operating at the stated efficiencies.
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.