Overall Rating Bronze - expired
Overall Score 37.31
Liaison Stephan Classen
Submission Date March 6, 2018
Executive Letter Download

STARS v2.1

Cascadia College
PA-3: Participatory Governance

Status Score Responsible Party
Complete 0.75 / 3.00 Atlas Turner
Cascadia Student Government President/ Student
Student Life
"---" indicates that no data was submitted for this field

Do the institution’s students have a representative body through which they can participate in governance (e.g. a student council)? :
Yes

Do the institution’s students have an elected representative on the institution’s highest governing body?:
No

A brief description of the bodies and mechanisms through which students are engaged in governance, including information to support each affirmative response above:

We have the Associated Students of Cascadia College, they are represented by the Cascadia Student Government, with six representatives.
President, Vice President, Director of Government Relations, Director of Budget and Finance, Director of Pluralism and Inclusion, Director of Public Relations and Technology.
The Cascadia Student Government President sits in on the Board of Trustees Meetings, or an appointed officer.
The students serving in these positions are placed in office through an application and selection process. The Student Government President does not have formal representation on the Cascadia Board of Trustees.


Do the institution’s staff members have a representative body through which they can participate in governance (e.g. a staff council)?:
Yes

Do the institution’s non-supervisory staff members have an elected representative on the institution’s highest governing body?:
No

A brief description of the bodies and mechanisms through which staff are engaged in governance, including information to support each affirmative response above:

Executive Assembly/ Exempt Assembly:
"The governance system of Cascadia College will operate through a formal system of Employee Advisory Groups and Councils. Recommendations resulting from team dialogue, including considerations from campus committees and task forces, will be forwarded through the appropriate organizational governance process or to appropriate administrators for further dialogue.

This charter defines the purpose, membership, work load, and rules associated with the Exempt Assembly. A copy of the charter must be kept on file with the President’s Office.

Teams are not responsible for employment or personnel matters including but not limited to the following:
• Tenure rules and procedures, or tenure recommendations
• Working conditions
• Employment contract issues
• Final decisions on administrative procedures, college policies, and/or operational matters which fall under the purview of other governance groups

As per Cascadia College’s Governance and Administration Policy (BP6: 1.10) all governance structures are advisory to the President. "

Cascadia has a similar assembly for Classified Staff.


Do the institution’s teaching and research faculty have a representative body through which they can participate in governance (e.g. a faculty senate)?:
Yes

Do the institution’s teaching and research faculty have an elected representative on the institution’s highest governing body? :
No

A brief description of the bodies and mechanisms through which teaching and research faculty are engaged in governance, including information to support each affirmative response above:

Faculty have a Faculty Assembly that meets twice a month. See description below:

The Faculty Governance structure described in this charter has been created with the purpose of being a forum for discussion, advice, and decision-making on issues which affect student learning and the faculty of Cascadia College. It is an intentional community in which the voices of all faculty and all disciplines are equally valued; it serves as a liaison between Faculty, Administration, and other College governance bodies; it is an advisory body to the Executive Team; and is representative of the collective voice of Faculty to the College at large.

Regularly Scheduled Meetings: 1st & 3rd Thursdays
3:30-5:00pm


Does the institution have written policies and procedures to identify and engage external stakeholders (i.e. local residents) in land use planning, capital investment projects, and other institutional decisions that affect the community?:
No

A copy of the written policies and procedures:
---

The policies and procedures:
---

Does the institution have formal participatory or shared governance bodies through which community members representing the interests of the following stakeholder groups can regularly participate in institutional governance?:
Yes or No
Local government and/or educational organizations No
Private sector organizations No
Civil society (e.g. NGOs, NPOs) No

A brief description of the bodies and mechanisms through which external stakeholders are engaged in institutional governance (including information about each stakeholder group selected above):
---

The website URL where information about the programs or initiatives is available:
---

Additional documentation to support the submission:
---

Data source(s) and notes about the submission:

It is unclear whether or not we have written policies and procedures to engage the public, governance documents include internal policies only.
However, a job description for College Relations, as an executive position indicates that our governance includes a representative that works to maintain presence in the community on behalf of Cascadia.
We also have the Cascadia Foundation.
There are no written policies on them.
Master Plan policy adopted mandates that we work with the University of Washington Bothell.


It is unclear whether or not we have written policies and procedures to engage the public, governance documents include internal policies only.
However, a job description for College Relations, as an executive position indicates that our governance includes a representative that works to maintain presence in the community on behalf of Cascadia.
We also have the Cascadia Foundation.
There are no written policies on them.
Master Plan policy adopted mandates that we work with the University of Washington Bothell.

The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.