| Overall Rating | Silver - expired |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 57.96 |
| Liaison | Tracey Coronado |
| Submission Date | March 15, 2018 |
| Executive Letter | Download |
Missouri State University
IN-18: Pre-Submission Review
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
0.50 / 0.50 |
Doug
Neidigh Sustainability Coordinator Environmental Management |
The name, title, and organizational affiliation of each reviewer:
Jennifer Cox, Assistant to the Vice President for Administrative Services, Missouri State University
A brief description of the review process:
The 2018 STARS report was exported from the STARS reporting tool as a spreadsheet and a PDF. These documents, along with the STARS Review Template, were provided to Jen Cox for her review of the data. After receiving Jen's comments and recommended actions, Jordan Schanda, the Sustainability Coordinator addressed each concern and provided a response in the review template spreadsheet. The revised STARS report was exported from the STARS reporting tool as a spreadsheet and a PDF and provided to Jen along with the updated review template. The updated credits were marked as meeting criteria and a letter of affirmation was provided by Jen.
Which of the following describes the review process?:
Affirmation from the reviewer that the submission has been reviewed in full and that any identified inconsistencies have been addressed:
Copy of the completed STARS Review Template:
Affirmation from an additional reviewer that the submission has been reviewed in full and that any identified inconsistencies have been addressed:
Copy of the completed STARS Review Template for the 2nd reviewer:
Affirmation from a 3rd reviewer that the submission has been reviewed in full and that any identified inconsistencies have been addressed:
Copy of the completed STARS Review Template for the 3rd reviewer:
Affirmation from a 4th reviewer that the submission has been reviewed in full and that any identified inconsistencies have been addressed:
Copy of the completed STARS Review Template for the 4th reviewer:
The website URL where information about the programs or initiatives is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.