Overall Rating Gold - expired
Overall Score 75.86
Liaison Tess Esposito
Submission Date March 2, 2018
Executive Letter Download

STARS v2.1

University of Dayton
IN-26: Innovation C

Status Score Responsible Party
Complete 1.00 / 1.00
"---" indicates that no data was submitted for this field

Name or title of the innovative policy, practice, program, or outcome:
Bridging Divides: National Issues Forums on Climate Choices

A brief description of the innovative policy, practice, program, or outcome that outlines how credit criteria are met and any positive measurable outcomes associated with the innovation:

In 2017, the University of Dayton's Hanley Sustainability Institute convened two pilot deliberative dialogues on Climate Solutions on campus and in the community. In this southwest Ohio region, climate change and discussion of mitigation and adaptation strategies is a polarizing issue. To begin to raise awareness of climate change, bridge the divides, create safe space for dialogue about the issue, and build trust and capacity for action, HSI adopted a model for deliberative participatory dialogues from the National Issues Forum Institute (NIFI.org). On campus, over 250 participants contributed from across the political and demographic spectrum – university students as part of courses, staff, faculty, and administration as well as Dayton community members. Over 60 students were trained as small group facilitors with deliberative dialogue techniques. In small group deliberations, individual participants weighed solutions and trade-offs in answer to the question “how should we meet the challenges of a warming planet?” The success of this initial convening in reaching across ideological divides, developing shared values, and generating capacity for action was evident in the participant feedback following the forum. “I never before sat down to listen to other's concerns” is one comment that illustrates the value of structured and deliberative civic engagement in addressing complex, polarized societal problems. "I didn't realize what an urgent issue climate change was until this forum" is another example of the impact of the conversations. Ten percent of the participants volunteered to take part in follow-up conversations.

HSI piloted a second Forum in the community, convening over 70 members of a church congregration. Again, UD students facilitated the small group deliberations reflecting participants' values and concerns about addressing climate change. The participants had similar responses and sense of relief at being able to talk with fellow church community members across the polarized divide. approximately two-thirds of the participants volunteered to contribute in follow-up action teams. The parish is now convening additional conversations and planning activities to raise up local solutions.


Which of the following impact areas does the innovation most closely relate to? (select up to three):
Campus Engagement
Public Engagement
Air & Climate

A letter of affirmation from an individual with relevant expertise or a press release or publication featuring the innovation :
---

The website URL where information about the programs or initiatives is available:
---

Additional documentation to support the submission:
---

Data source(s) and notes about the submission:

The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.