Overall Rating Gold - expired
Overall Score 70.07
Liaison Andrew Horning
Submission Date June 30, 2015
Executive Letter Download

STARS v2.0

University of Michigan
IN-2: Innovation 2

Status Score Responsible Party
Complete 1.00 / 1.00 Donald Scavia
Director
Graham Environmental Sustainability Institute
"---" indicates that no data was submitted for this field

Title or keywords related to the innovative policy, practice, program, or outcome:
Michigan Journal of Sustainability

A brief description of the innovative policy, practice, program, or outcome:

Sustainability problems are by their nature interdisciplinary. They often require innovations that integrate knowledge from multiple disciplines, including the social sciences, natural sciences, and policy fields. Yet, establishing lines of communication among scientists, practitioners, and policymakers in different disciplines can be challenging, as they may use very different frameworks and terminologies. The Michigan Journal of Sustainability aims to foster transdisciplinary communication by publishing timely, innovative, stimulating, and informative articles that translate scholarly research on systemic sustainability problems into useful formats for practitioners and policy makers. The Journal focuses on three areas: (1) sustainable freshwater systems, (2) livable communities, and (3) responses to climate variability and change. We encourage submissions that address these research areas, both locally and globally, as well as projects that bridge them. The Journal is designed to appeal to readers from a broad range of specialties and backgrounds, and papers are edited to be comprehensible to those reading outside of their own area of expertise. Founded and overseen by University of Michigan graduate students, the Journal is sponsored by the Graham Sustainability Institute at the University of Michigan. Peer Review Process and Open Access Policy: Manuscripts submitted to the Journal undergo a double-blind review process. They are read by an infield reviewer, an out-of-field reviewer, and a member of the Editorial board for accuracy, quality, and relevance to the Journal’s focus. In addition, articles are rated in three areas to determine acceptance: (1) potential for idea transfer and development across fields; (2) immediate use for practitioners and policy makers; and (3) clarity and readiness for print. The Journal provides open access to all content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. Such access is associated with increased readership and increased citation of an author’s work. Management of the indexing process falls under the auspices of MPublishing at the University of Michigan.


A brief description of any positive measurable outcomes associated with the innovation (if not reported above):
---

A letter of affirmation from an individual with relevant expertise:
Which of the following STARS subcategories does the innovation most closely relate to? (Select all that apply up to a maximum of five):
Yes or No
Curriculum ---
Research Yes
Campus Engagement Yes
Public Engagement Yes
Air & Climate ---
Buildings ---
Dining Services ---
Energy Yes
Grounds ---
Purchasing ---
Transportation ---
Waste ---
Water Yes
Coordination, Planning & Governance ---
Diversity & Affordability ---
Health, Wellbeing & Work ---
Investment ---

Other topic(s) that the innovation relates to that are not listed above:
---

The website URL where information about the innovation is available:
---

Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---

The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.