Overall Rating Silver - expired
Overall Score 46.60
Liaison Caitlin McLennan
Submission Date Oct. 22, 2013
Executive Letter Download

STARS v1.2

Utah State University
OP-17: Waste Reduction

Status Score Responsible Party
Complete 0.37 / 5.00 Nate Schwartz
Recycling Coordinator
Facilities
"---" indicates that no data was submitted for this field

Weight of materials recycled, 2005 baseline year :
615.40 Tons

Weight of materials composted, 2005 baseline year :
50 Tons

Weight of materials disposed as garbage, 2005 baseline year :
1,845.20 Tons

Weight of materials recycled, performance year :
575.30 Tons

Weight of materials composted, performance year :
50 Tons

Weight of materials disposed as garbage, performance year :
1,876.50 Tons

List the start and end dates of the waste reduction performance year:
7/2011-6/2012

On-campus residents, 2005:
2,381

Non-residential/commuter full-time students, faculty, and staff members, 2005:
13,590

Non-residential/commuter part-time students, faculty, and staff members, 2005:
7,705

On-campus residents, performance year:
3,515

Non-residential/commuter full-time students, faculty, and staff members, performance year:
14,884

Non-residential/commuter part-time students, faculty, and staff members, performance year:
4,648

Time period for weighted campus user (list the consecutive 12 month period that most closely overlaps with waste reduction performance year):
2012

Indication of whether institution has a stated commitment to waste-reduction goals, such as zero waste:
Yes

A brief description of the plan of action to achieve waste reduction goals:

The university has set a waste reduction goal from 25% to 35% by FY 2016. The Waste and Recycling Work Group in the Sustainability Council is conducting waste audits, setting bin standards for new construction, adding new bins for athletic events, and working on signage strategies.


The website URL where information about the institution’s waste reduction initiatives is available:
---

Data source(s) and notes about the submission:

Compost was estimated both in the baseline and performance year. E-waste, oil, tires, fluorescent bulbs, and batteries were weighed in the baseline but not in the performance year. They were estimated to have remained the same so as to not artificially lower the weight of waste produced by the university.


Compost was estimated both in the baseline and performance year. E-waste, oil, tires, fluorescent bulbs, and batteries were weighed in the baseline but not in the performance year. They were estimated to have remained the same so as to not artificially lower the weight of waste produced by the university.

The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.