Overall Rating | Gold |
---|---|
Overall Score | 73.99 |
Liaison | Mary-Lee Townsend |
Submission Date | Oct. 20, 2021 |
Western University
OP-1: Emissions Inventory and Disclosure
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
2.04 / 3.00 |
Mary-Lee
Townsend Sustainability & Compliance Manager Sustainability Office |
Has the institution conducted a GHG emissions inventory within the previous three years that includes all Scope 1 and 2 emissions? :
A copy of the most recent GHG emissions inventory:
A brief description of the methodology and/or tool used to complete the GHG emissions inventory:
GHG Emissions reported per the requirements of Canada's Output-Based Pricing System regulations.
Has the GHG emissions inventory been validated internally by personnel who are independent of the GHG accounting and reporting process and/or verified by an independent, external third party?:
A brief description of the GHG inventory verification process:
Verified as part of ISO 14064-3:2006 certification.
Documentation to support the GHG inventory verification process:
Gross Scope 1 GHG emissions, performance year:
Weight in MTCO2e | |
Stationary combustion | 54,163 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Other sources (mobile combustion, process emissions, fugitive emissions) | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Total gross Scope 1 GHG emissions, performance year:
Gross Scope 2 GHG emissions, performance year (market-based):
Weight in MTCO2e | |
Imported electricity | 4,670 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Imported thermal energy | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Total gross Scope 2 GHG emissions, performance year:
Gross GHG emissions from biogenic sources, performance year:
Does the GHG emissions inventory include Scope 3 emissions from the following sources?:
Yes or No | Weight in MTCO2e | |
Business travel | No | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Commuting | No | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Purchased goods and services | No | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Capital goods | No | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Fuel- and energy-related activities not included in Scope 1 or Scope 2 | No | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Waste generated in operations | No | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Other sources | No | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Total Scope 3 GHG emissions, performance year:
A brief description of how the institution accounted for its Scope 3 emissions:
NA
Has the institution completed an inventory within the previous three years to quantify its air pollutant emissions?:
Annual weight of emissions for::
Weight of Emissions | |
Nitrogen oxides (NOx) | 90.89 Metric tons |
Sulfur oxides (SOx) | --- |
Carbon monoxide (CO) | 36.97 Metric tons |
Particulate matter (PM) | 0.87 Metric tons |
Ozone (O3) | --- |
Lead (Pb) | --- |
Hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) | --- |
Ozone-depleting compounds (ODCs) | --- |
Other standard categories of air emissions identified in permits and/or regulations | --- |
Do the air pollutant emissions figures provided include the following sources?:
Yes or No | |
Major stationary sources | Yes |
Area sources | No |
Mobile sources | No |
Commuting | No |
Off-site electricity production | No |
A brief description of the methodology(ies) the institution used to complete its air emissions inventory:
Many of the University Buildings have air permits in place, each requiring an Emissions Summary and Dispersion Modelling report. An Emissions Summary and Dispersion Modelling ("ESDM") Report is a report that, as its name implies, covers an assessment of air pollution emissions from a facility, and how they disperse after they are released. An ESDM report must specifically include the content listed in, and use the methodologies described in, section 26 of O. Reg. 419/05. In this way, Western is able to keep track of it's emissions and maintain compliance.
Gross Scope 2 GHG emissions from purchased electricity (location-based):
Gross Scope 2 GHG emissions from imported thermal energy (location-based) :
Website URL where information about the institution’s emissions inventories is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.