Overall Rating Silver - expired
Overall Score 50.21
Liaison Elizabeth Swiman
Submission Date Aug. 1, 2011
Executive Letter Download

STARS v1.0

Florida State University
PAE-2: Strategic Plan

Status Score Responsible Party
Complete 6.00 / 6.00 Elizabeth Swiman
Director of Campus Sustainability
Facilities
"---" indicates that no data was submitted for this field

Year the strategic plan or equivalent was completed or adopted:
2,009

Does the institution's strategic plan or equivalent guiding document include the environmental dimensions of sustainability at a high level?:
Yes

A brief description of how the strategic plan or amendment addresses the environmental dimensions of sustainability:

Strategic priority 6.5 states that FSU shall "achieve excellence in the sustainable campus environment."

Critical success factors include: increased recycling; reduced fuel and water consumption to cut emissions and discharges; promotion of sustainable transportation solutions.


Does the institution's strategic plan or equivalent guiding document include the social dimensions of sustainability at a high level?:
Yes

A brief description of how the strategic plan or amendment addresses the social dimensions of sustainability:

Critical success factors of strategic priority 6.0 include the promotion and demonstration of new economically, environmentally, and SOCIALLY sustainable practices.


Does the institution's strategic plan or equivalent guiding document include the economic dimensions of sustainability at a high level?:
Yes

A brief description of how the strategic plan or amendment addresses the economic dimensions of sustainability:

Critical success factors for Strategic Priority 6.0 (ensure operational excellence while maintaining financial integrity) include reducing costs by implementing system-wide energy conservation and green building technologies and practices.


The website URL where information about the strategic plan is available:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:

Strategic priorities (and supporting goals) are key areas, aligned to and consistent with the mission and vision, in which the University will invest incremental resources above and beyond those for normal day-to-day operations.


Strategic priorities (and supporting goals) are key areas, aligned to and consistent with the mission and vision, in which the University will invest incremental resources above and beyond those for normal day-to-day operations.

The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.