| Overall Rating | Platinum |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 86.09 |
| Liaison | Jennifer Andrews |
| Submission Date | Aug. 16, 2021 |
University of New Hampshire
PA-4: Reporting Assurance
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
1.00 / 1.00 |
Jennifer
Andrews Project Director Sustainability Institute |
Has the institution completed an assurance process that provides independent affirmation that the information in its current STARS report is reported in accordance with credit criteria?:
Did the assurance process include internal review, an external audit, or both?:
The name, title, and organizational affiliation of each reviewer:
Jade Chalkley
Peer to Peer Coordinator
UNH Sustainability Institute
Dr. Allison Leach
Postdoctoral Research Associate
UNH Sustainability Institute
A brief description of the institution’s assurance process:
All reported data was reviewed by 2 staff members in the Sustainability Institute who were not directly involved in the data collection process for the credits they reviewed. Jade Chalkley reviewed all credits except for EN1 and EN7 that were reviewed by Dr. Leach. Both reviewers used the review template, reviewed all the credits that UNH is pursuing, and documented in the template the issues that they identified across all required reporting fields, attachments, inventories, and included URLs to confirm that the reported information met credit criteria and is consistent with required timeframes and that reported figures are consistent across credits. The STARS team updated the data in response to comments from reviewers.
Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to submitting it to AASHE:
Completed STARS Review Template:
Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to submitting it to AASHE (2nd review):
Completed STARS Review Template (2nd review):
Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to submitting it to AASHE (3rd review):
Copy of completed STARS Review Template (3rd review):
Website URL where information about the institution’s reporting assurance is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.