| Overall Rating | Gold |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 67.35 |
| Liaison | Juliana Goodlaw-Morris |
| Submission Date | Feb. 6, 2024 |
California State University, San Marcos
PA-4: Reporting Assurance
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
1.00 / 1.00 |
Juliana
Goodlaw-Morris Sustainability Manager Safety, Risk and Sustainability |
Has the institution completed an assurance process that provides independent affirmation that the information in its current STARS report is reported in accordance with credit criteria?:
Did the assurance process include internal review, an external audit, or both?:
The name, title, and organizational affiliation of each reviewer:
Kylee Singh, Sustainability Coordinator, Cal Poly San Luis Obispo
Chad Worth, Energy and Sustainability Manager, Cal Poly San Luis Obispo
Maya Sandhofer, AmericCorps Volunteer Infrastructure Program Fellow, Cal Poly San Luis Obispo
Krisha Pedraza, Sustainability Student Assistant, Cal State San Marcos
A brief description of the institution’s assurance process:
Krisha Pedraza did a first internal review. Then Cal Poly staff reviewed our credits two times. Both our student assistant and Cal Poly used the STARS review template provided to review our credits. We then went back and forth on a number of credits and CSUSM corrected a number of areas that either were required or suggested for change. Ultimately this process was helpful for CSUSM and allowed us to clarify a number of credits.
Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to submitting it to AASHE:
Completed STARS Review Template:
Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to submitting it to AASHE (2nd review):
Completed STARS Review Template (2nd review):
Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to submitting it to AASHE (3rd review):
Copy of completed STARS Review Template (3rd review):
Website URL where information about the institution’s reporting assurance is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.