| Overall Rating | Gold |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 67.32 |
| Liaison | Jennifer Daniels |
| Submission Date | Jan. 31, 2024 |
California State University, Stanislaus
PA-4: Reporting Assurance
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
1.00 / 1.00 |
Jennifer
Daniels Sustainability Specialist CPFM |
Has the institution completed an assurance process that provides independent affirmation that the information in its current STARS report is reported in accordance with credit criteria?:
Did the assurance process include internal review, an external audit, or both?:
The name, title, and organizational affiliation of each reviewer:
Internal Review: Tiffani Sandoval Rodriguez, College Corps Fellow - Climate Action, Stan State
External Review: Taylor Mogavero, Climate Action Coordinator, and Caitlin Steele, Director of Sustainability & Energy at San Francisco State University
A brief description of the institution’s assurance process:
Members of contributing departments were given the opportunity to review the STARS report. College Corps Fellow Tiffani Sandoval Rodriguez was the lead reviewer, using the STARS review template to provide feedback on inconsistencies and errors; the Sustainability Specialist confirmed any inconsistencies and errors with the appropriate internal teams, to ensure the data provided was accurate and made necessary corrections.
Taylor Mogavero, Climate Action Coordinator and Caitlin Steele, Director of Sustainability & Energy at San Francisco State University conducted an external review and provided feedback with a shared access Google sheet of the STARS Review template. Stan State reviewed comments and suggestions to make appropriate corrections, to address errors, inconsistencies, and clarifications as required.
Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to submitting it to AASHE:
Completed STARS Review Template:
Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to submitting it to AASHE (2nd review):
Completed STARS Review Template (2nd review):
Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to submitting it to AASHE (3rd review):
Copy of completed STARS Review Template (3rd review):
Website URL where information about the institution’s reporting assurance is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.