|Rating||Score||Liaison||Submission Date||Executive Letter|
|Silver||46.90||Hannes Gerhardt||March 30, 2018||Download|
The grey bar displays the scores for all STARS rated institutions of the same basic type as the institution featured in the report (Associate, Baccalaureate, Master, or Doctorate) in quartiles. Hovering over the bar reveals the
For FY2015 we are answering credits associated with the Princeton Review in addition to a few additional credits . For Academics, this includes AC 1, 2, 3, 8, 9 and 10.
|Academic Courses||Complete||7.07 / 14.00|
|Learning Outcomes||Complete||0.04 / 8.00|
|Undergraduate Program||Complete||1.50 / 3.00|
|Graduate Program||Complete||3.00 / 3.00|
|Immersive Experience||Complete||2.00 / 2.00|
|Sustainability Literacy Assessment||Complete||2.00 / 4.00|
|Incentives for Developing Courses||Complete||2.00 / 2.00|
|Campus as a Living Laboratory||Complete||4.00 / 4.00|
For FY 2015, we are only answering EN-3 in order to meet the requirements of the Princeton Review for Green Schools.
|Student Educators Program||Complete||0.90 / 4.00|
|Student Orientation||Complete||1.68 / 2.00|
|Student Life||Complete||2.00 / 2.00|
|Outreach Materials and Publications||Complete||2.00 / 2.00|
|Outreach Campaign||Complete||4.00 / 4.00|
|Assessing Sustainability Culture||Not Pursuing||0.00 / 1.00|
|Employee Educators Program||Not Pursuing||0.00 / 3.00|
|Employee Orientation||Complete||0.19 / 1.00|
|Staff Professional Development||Complete||1.00 / 2.00|
|Landscape Management||Complete||1.00 / 2.00|
This credit is weighted more heavily for institutions that own or manage land that includes or is adjacent to any of the following:
Institutions may identify legally protected areas, internationally recognized areas, priority sites for biodiversity, and regions of conservation importance using the Integrated Biodiversity Assessment Tool (IBAT) for Research & Conservation Planning, the U.S. Information, Planning, and Conservation (IPaC) decision support system, or an equivalent resource or study.
This credit is weighted more heavily for institutions located in areas of water stress and scarcity and less heavily for institutions in areas with relative water abundance. The points available for this credit are determined by the level of ”Physical Risk QUANTITY” for the institution’s main campus,, as indicated by the World Resources Institute’s Aqueduct Water Risk Atlas and detailed in the following table:
|Rainwater Management||Complete||1.00 / 2.00|
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE
staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution and complete the Data Inquiry Form.