| Overall Rating | Silver |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 53.71 |
| Liaison | Rosemary Potter |
| Submission Date | Nov. 28, 2023 |
TAFE Queensland Robina Campus
PA-4: Reporting Assurance
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
1.00 / 1.00 |
Rosemary
Potter Project Manager Executive Services - GM |
Has the institution completed an assurance process that provides independent affirmation that the information in its current STARS report is reported in accordance with credit criteria?:
Did the assurance process include internal review, an external audit, or both?:
The name, title, and organizational affiliation of each reviewer:
EXTERNAL
*University of Tasmania: Carmen Primo Perez
Senior Sustainability Officer
E: carmen.primo@utas.edu.au
INTERNAL
*General Manager: Karen Dickinson
*Executive Director, Education & Training: Shane Palmada
*Director of Faculty: Lisa Wynter
*Executive Director: Executive Director, People, Culture & Communication: Gil Flori
*Director, Assets, Facilities & WHS: George Anderson
*Executive Director, Student Support & Facilities: Scott Meredith
A brief description of the institution’s assurance process:
Robina Campus has completed an internal review. The internal review was completed by assigning members of the senior leadership team and selected Directors to 2 different category areas each. An individual was assigned a category area of specialisation i.e. Academic so that they could provide further expertise or comments. The second category area assigned is where they did not have expertise but viewed the material as a 'reader' to determine the level of understanding.
The external review was completed by the University of Tasmania. All reviewers have used the STARS Review Template.
Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to submitting it to AASHE:
Completed STARS Review Template:
Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to submitting it to AASHE (2nd review):
Completed STARS Review Template (2nd review):
Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to submitting it to AASHE (3rd review):
Copy of completed STARS Review Template (3rd review):
Website URL where information about the institution’s reporting assurance is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
The affirmation documents and review templates for both the internal and external reviews have been attached.
The affirmation documents and review templates for both the internal and external reviews have been attached.
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.