| Overall Rating | Gold |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 68.02 |
| Liaison | Maxine Dandois-Fafard |
| Submission Date | Nov. 10, 2023 |
Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique (INRS)
PA-4: Reporting Assurance
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
1.00 / 1.00 |
Maxine
Dandois-Fafard Sustainable Development Officer Scientific Direction |
Has the institution completed an assurance process that provides independent affirmation that the information in its current STARS report is reported in accordance with credit criteria?:
Did the assurance process include internal review, an external audit, or both?:
The name, title, and organizational affiliation of each reviewer:
Mohamed Aziz Ben Rhouma
MSc student, INRS
Mohamed_Aziz.BEN_RHOUMA@inrs.ca
A brief description of the institution’s assurance process:
INRS MSc student Aziz Ben Rhouma reviewed INRS first STARS report using the Excel review template. Every applied credit was carefully read, along with criteria and common issues, and every URL was clicked on. The reviewer commented in the Excel sheet all the information to revise or that seemed off. INRS Sustainability Officer Maxine Dandois-Fafard then updated the report and reported all the changes made on the Excel sheet. The updated Excel sheet was returned to the reviewer, and four last comments were given. The SD Officer made the final correction and returned the Excel review sheet to the reviewer. The reviewer checked the review sheet one last time and then signed off on the final report review.
Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to submitting it to AASHE:
Completed STARS Review Template:
Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to submitting it to AASHE (2nd review):
Completed STARS Review Template (2nd review):
Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to submitting it to AASHE (3rd review):
Copy of completed STARS Review Template (3rd review):
Website URL where information about the institution’s reporting assurance is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.