Overall Rating Silver
Overall Score 58.27
Liaison Alice Goupilleau
Submission Date July 19, 2023

STARS v2.2

Université Téluq
OP-2: Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Status Score Responsible Party
Complete 3.76 / 8.00 Hubert Corbeil
Conseiller à la direction générale
Direction générale
"---" indicates that no data was submitted for this field

Gross Scope 1 and Scope 2 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions:
Performance year Baseline year
Gross Scope 1 GHG emissions from stationary combustion 102 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent 77 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
Gross Scope 1 GHG emissions from other sources 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
Gross Scope 2 GHG emissions from imported electricity 2 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent 2 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
Gross Scope 2 GHG emissions from imported thermal energy 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
Total 104 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent 79 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent

Figures needed to determine net carbon sinks:
Performance year Baseline year
Third-party verified carbon offsets purchased 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
Institution-catalyzed carbon offsets generated 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
Carbon storage from on-site composting 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
Carbon storage from non-additional sequestration --- ---
Carbon sold or transferred 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
Net carbon sinks 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent

A brief description of the carbon sinks, including vendor, project source, verification program and contract timeframes (as applicable):
---

Adjusted net Scope 1 and Scope 2 GHG emissions:
Performance year Baseline year
Adjusted net GHG emissions 104 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent 79 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent

Start and end dates of the performance year and baseline year (or three-year periods):
Performance year Baseline year
Start date May 1, 2021 May 1, 2019
End date April 30, 2022 April 30, 2020

A brief description of when and why the GHG emissions baseline was adopted:
---

Figures needed to determine “Weighted Campus Users”:
Performance year Baseline year
Number of students resident on-site 0 0
Number of employees resident on-site 0 0
Number of other individuals resident on-site 0 0
Total full-time equivalent student enrollment 3,692.37 3,199.30
Full-time equivalent of employees 491 503.80
Full-time equivalent of students enrolled exclusively in distance education 3,692.37 3,199.30
Weighted Campus Users 368.25 377.85

Adjusted net Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions per weighted campus user:
Performance year Baseline year
Adjusted net Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions per weighted campus user 0.28 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent 0.21 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent

Percentage reduction in adjusted net Scope 1 and Scope 2 GHG emissions per weighted campus user from baseline:
0

Gross floor area of building space, performance year:
7,896 Gross square meters

Floor area of energy intensive building space, performance year:
Floor area
Laboratory space 0 Square meters
Healthcare space 0 Square meters
Other energy intensive space 73.40 Square meters

EUI-adjusted floor area, performance year:
7,969.40 Gross square meters

Adjusted net Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions per unit of EUI-adjusted floor area, performance year:
0.01 MtCO2e per square meter

A brief description of the institution’s GHG emissions reduction initiatives:

Since 2019, several natural gas strategies have been deployed to improve energy efficiency in the building. In 2019, fresh air ventilation rates were adjusted and variable frequency drives were added for the building’s main ventilation unit fans. The following year, the efficiency of the natural gas humidifiers was improved.


Website URL where information about the institution's GHG emissions is available:
---

Additional documentation to support the submission:
---

Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---

The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.