| Overall Rating | Silver |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 58.27 |
| Liaison | Alice Goupilleau |
| Submission Date | July 19, 2023 |
Université Téluq
PA-4: Reporting Assurance
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
1.00 / 1.00 |
Hubert
Corbeil Conseiller à la direction générale Direction générale |
Has the institution completed an assurance process that provides independent affirmation that the information in its current STARS report is reported in accordance with credit criteria?:
Did the assurance process include internal review, an external audit, or both?:
The name, title, and organizational affiliation of each reviewer:
Karima Cherifi, Université TÉLUQ research assistant (general management) and student at HEC Montréal, conducted a review of Université TÉLUQ’s STARS submission.
A brief description of the institution’s assurance process:
The STARS Review Template was given to the reviewer by the Université TÉLUQ Sustainability team. The Sustainability team also provided the reviewer with information about the review process.
The reviewer was asked to complete the STARS Review Template. A contact person from the Sustainability team revised and updated the STARS file based on any inconsistencies and errors identified by the reviewer. She also completed the review document with notes on the changes made (institutional response).
The Sustainability team contact person also met weekly with the reviewer to answer questions.
Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to submitting it to AASHE:
Completed STARS Review Template:
Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to submitting it to AASHE (2nd review):
Completed STARS Review Template (2nd review):
Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to submitting it to AASHE (3rd review):
Copy of completed STARS Review Template (3rd review):
Website URL where information about the institution’s reporting assurance is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.